Problems with V 8-6-4 ????
Cadillac
 

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds / (Old System)

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors

CadillacForums.com is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Closed Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 89
500, 472, 425, 368 Discussion, Problems with V 8-6-4 ???? in Cadillac Engine Technical Discussion; We all know that the V 8-6-4 got a bad reputation for bad reliabilty. But it was a good idea ...
  1. #1
    I~LUV~Caddys8792's Avatar
    I~LUV~Caddys8792 is offline Moderator
    Automobile(s): '14 Honda Accord LX
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Roseville, MN.
    Age
    27
    Posts
    34,073

    Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    We all know that the V 8-6-4 got a bad reputation for bad reliabilty.
    But it was a good idea that was very ahead of its time.
    What were the major problems with this system?
    Why did it fail so bad?
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  2. Remove Advertisements
    CadillacForums.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Night Wolf's Avatar
    Night Wolf is offline Cadillac Owners 10000+ Posts
    Automobile(s): Unicycle
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Where I park it
    Posts
    11,009

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    Because the 1981 computer coudln't keep up with the system it had to control.

    A 90* V8 will run smooth on 8 cylinders, and even on 4 cylinders (in the case of select cylinders being shut down) but NOT V6 mode... no matter what cylinders you shut down. (Notice how none of the new...as in todays systems are V8/6/4, just V8/V4)

    So when the computer would tell the engine to run on 6 cylinders, it would start to shake alot and wasn't very smooth.

    The computer would knock down cylinders based on engine load... usualy by throttle input and manifold pressure... but that system is flawed because if you are coasting down a hill it would knock it down to V4, but then go to hit the gas and it would stumble around a bit before it switches the V8 mode to accelerate. Same thing for around town, it would switch between V8-6-4 alot.

    It would ONLY deactivate cylinders when in high gear, so it woudln't do it in stop and go traffic... but even at 35mph, its in 3rd and would start cutting cylinders back.

    There are a few more things as well.... all pretty much about the same thing.

    Well, another thing was, the V8-6-4 feature was never counted in the EPA fuel things, so on paper, it didn't get much better mileage then prevoius versions. So the whole idea behind it.... better fuel mileage while still having V8 power was now kinda shot down on the window sticker thanks to the EPA.

    Notice how none of the problems were due to the selonoids themselves or the physical deactivation method, because both are about as simple and solid as they can get.

    Fast forward 25 years and we now have the system coming back. Instead of messing with the rockers, they are now in the valley and change the lifters a bit... why? the V8-6-4 was ugly looking, humps in the valve covers... with none of that up there, they now have a sleek looking engine again.

    No more V6 mode... GM/Chrysler now realize you can't make a 90* V8 run smooth in V6 mode, so they stopped it all together. V8 or V4.... keep it simple. Plus these new engines have the power to push V4... the 368 needed the V6 mode to act as a buffer as it was somewhat low on power already. Which is why on even a 425, the V6 mode wouldn't be used either, there is enough power to push 4cylinder mode.

    Finally, the computer systems today are far more advance and can handle it so it is now seamless operation.

    The Cadillac Sixteen has V16-8-4 mode.... they can get away with that, because the V16 WILL be smooth in V8 mode.... it's all about balance on the crankshaft.

    In the case of what I want to do, I want to wire up all 4 selonoids to an on/off toggle switch, mount it somewhere on the dash, so its either V8 or V4... when I want... either crusing on the highway, maybe when stuck in traffic etc... if there is enough power in V4 mode, I'll use it... otherwise I have V8. It is a very solid system, I am glad I got the parts off atleast 1 of them so far.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  4. #3
    I~LUV~Caddys8792's Avatar
    I~LUV~Caddys8792 is offline Moderator
    Automobile(s): '14 Honda Accord LX
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Roseville, MN.
    Age
    27
    Posts
    34,073

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    When it was in V-4 mode, did it have 1/2 of the horsepower?
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  5. #4
    Night Wolf's Avatar
    Night Wolf is offline Cadillac Owners 10000+ Posts
    Automobile(s): Unicycle
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Where I park it
    Posts
    11,009

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    probably
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  6. #5
    SilverFleetwood85's Avatar
    SilverFleetwood85 is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 1992 Cadillac Sedan Deville
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Colorado
    Age
    30
    Posts
    175

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    Hey Night Wolf thanks for explaining how the V8-6-4 worked. I had an idea but was not sure why it was hated so much, sounds like the car was awful to drive.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  7. #6
    Night Wolf's Avatar
    Night Wolf is offline Cadillac Owners 10000+ Posts
    Automobile(s): Unicycle
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Where I park it
    Posts
    11,009

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    It worked by simply changing the rotation point of the rocker arm. Instead of it piviting in the middle to open/close the valve, the pivit point was effectivly raised, letting the rocker itself move up and down. Both valves would stay closed.

    The dead cylinders were hardly any extra work on the rest of the engine, the same fuel/air kept getting compressed, all the energy used to compress it was gained back.

    It was an amazing system, the theory behind it is great, and is now being used again.

    One of the reasons I like it so much... and want to adapt it onto my engine.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  8. #7
    I~LUV~Caddys8792's Avatar
    I~LUV~Caddys8792 is offline Moderator
    Automobile(s): '14 Honda Accord LX
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Roseville, MN.
    Age
    27
    Posts
    34,073

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    It was very ahead of its time, and I give Cadillac & GM TONS of credit for inventing it. I just wish they would have held on to it longer and refined it, and possibly made the 8-6-4 optional to the HT4100. That would have been cool!
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  9. #8
    Night Wolf's Avatar
    Night Wolf is offline Cadillac Owners 10000+ Posts
    Automobile(s): Unicycle
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Where I park it
    Posts
    11,009

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    errr....

    The HT4100 had a hard enough time trying to move the car around on 8 cylinders... why in the world would you want to then cut it back to 4 cylinders!?

    Kinda like... how did they make a Chevette slower?....they put a diesel in it....
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  10. #9
    I~LUV~Caddys8792's Avatar
    I~LUV~Caddys8792 is offline Moderator
    Automobile(s): '14 Honda Accord LX
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Roseville, MN.
    Age
    27
    Posts
    34,073

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    No i mean make the HT4100 standard, and have the 368 V8-6-4 optional

    my aunt learned how to drive stick on a Chevette diesel. :/
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  11. #10
    bigblockcaddy is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    arizona
    Age
    26
    Posts
    38

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    hey what engine is the ht4100 is that the v6 or v8???i like how the engine looks on the 8-6-4..its unique and think its a great invention for back in 1981.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  12. #11
    I~LUV~Caddys8792's Avatar
    I~LUV~Caddys8792 is offline Moderator
    Automobile(s): '14 Honda Accord LX
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Roseville, MN.
    Age
    27
    Posts
    34,073

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    HT4100- 249 Cid Cadillac V8
    252 cid Buick V6 has no cool name
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  13. #12
    bigblockcaddy is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    arizona
    Age
    26
    Posts
    38

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    whats special about the ht4100?cause it seems people like it..i havent done any research on it??
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  14. #13
    I~LUV~Caddys8792's Avatar
    I~LUV~Caddys8792 is offline Moderator
    Automobile(s): '14 Honda Accord LX
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Roseville, MN.
    Age
    27
    Posts
    34,073

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    Its a very fragile motor. It was ahead of its time for 1982, but it was under engineered and rushed into market unready. It seems that they have problems with coolant leaks, headgasket not sealing, intake manifold not sealing, the oil pump was faulty, and IIRC, the water pump was faulty also. Most dont last past 60k miles, but some do last to 150k miles.

    Oh yeah, and they are VERY underpowered. 125-135hp for a 4100lb car

    I don't mean to piss any HT4100 owners off, this is just what I have heard.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  15. #14
    caddeville's Avatar
    caddeville is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): 1991 Deville / 1989 BMW 635csi
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    British Columbia, CANADA
    Age
    23
    Posts
    896

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    Very fragile motor???? No man, my dads 4100 has 170,000 miles and has plenty of power and he doesn't drive it like a baby. We were 1 1/2 hours late to airport for my uncle, and my dad beat the living shit out of that motor. I could swear that the rpms were maxed out. Still runs like a clock and we never had ANY gasket issues!! Take off is great also. My dad drives the caddy like he drove his M6. Tranny is also original, the car just needs engine mounts. I took out the plugs from bieng 8 years old, and they looked new. The 4100 isn't bad in the FWD cars, 82-85 RWD cars, that engine is useless. That is where you start to blow everything.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

  16. #15
    I~LUV~Caddys8792's Avatar
    I~LUV~Caddys8792 is offline Moderator
    Automobile(s): '14 Honda Accord LX
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Roseville, MN.
    Age
    27
    Posts
    34,073

    Re: Problems with V 8-6-4 ????

    Yeah, its decent in the 85-87 FWD models, due to the lighter weight car, and its had 3 years of refinements/ improvements.
    It was quite fragile in 1982-84, and the 85 Brougham.
    Quick reply to this message Reply  

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Bookmarks

Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum
Need products for your Cadillac? Check out your options at the links below:

custom floor mats | Cadillac Chrome and Black Chrome Wheels | window tinting