Cadillac
 

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: fully loaded vs luxury?

  1. #1
    Knight75 is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): escalade
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Age
    41
    Posts
    51

    fully loaded vs luxury?

    i have the option of buying a 2009 (3.6 liter) 66k fully loaded( no warranty) for 24g vs 2010( 3.0) luxury package with 15k for 27K. 2009 has cashmere interior. cant decide!! any thoughts??


  2. Remove Advertisements
    CadillacForums.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    MoistCabbage's Avatar
    MoistCabbage is offline Cadillac Owners 10000+ Posts
    Automobile(s): 2001 Seville STS, 1990 Seville (RIP), 1972 Sedan Deville
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East Boston MA.
    Age
    29
    Posts
    26,323
    "Fully loaded" is a meaningless, used car dealer term, used to describe pretty much any car with an automatic transmission and power windows.

    Lots more you need to know about a used car than just the mileage and price. Impossible to answer your question with the info provided.

  4. #3
    gohawks63's Avatar
    gohawks63 is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 2012 Black Diamond CTS-V Coupe
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,350

    Re: fully loaded vs luxury?

    What is the trim level of the 2009? Performance? Premium? AWD or RWD?

    In general the 3.6L is the preferred engine, but as has been said. Need more information.

  5. #4
    Knight75 is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): escalade
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Age
    41
    Posts
    51

    Re: fully loaded vs luxury?

    its a 2009 performance/rwd, with all options. 2010 has/rwd/ sunroof/18"wheels, sport suspension.limited slip differential/xenon HiD lights. NO Comfort&Convenience package or Sight&Sound. hope that helps

  6. #5
    gohawks63's Avatar
    gohawks63 is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 2012 Black Diamond CTS-V Coupe
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,350
    Quote Originally Posted by Knight75
    its a 2009 performance/rwd, with all options. 2010 has/rwd/ sunroof/18"wheels, sport suspension.limited slip differential/xenon HiD lights. NO Comfort&Convenience package or Sight&Sound. hope that helps
    Performance isn't the top trim level. Does it have navigation?

  7. #6
    Knight75 is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): escalade
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Age
    41
    Posts
    51

    Re: fully loaded vs luxury?

    yes i does

  8. #7
    99flhr is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): CTS
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    722

    Re: fully loaded vs luxury?

    15K vs 66K Not even a question. JMO

  9. #8
    gohawks63's Avatar
    gohawks63 is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 2012 Black Diamond CTS-V Coupe
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,350
    Quote Originally Posted by 99flhr
    15K vs 66K Not even a question. JMO
    Despite the disparity in content, I was thinking the same thing.

  10. #9
    Jayceejay is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): 2014 ATS 2.0T RWD
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    76

    Re: fully loaded vs luxury?

    I was in a similar situation when I purchased my 2010. For the savings and peace of mind by still having manufacturer warranty made my decision fairly easy.

  11. #10
    Tbbt is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 2010 CTS4 Premium Wagon-Diamond White-Cashmere Interior
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Castle Pines, CO
    Age
    73
    Posts
    2,391

    Re: fully loaded vs luxury?

    In another post he said he bought the low mileage 3.0L.

  12. #11
    dreiloft's Avatar
    dreiloft is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 2014 XTS, 2012 Coupe traded, 2010 CTS 4 Dr traded
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Doral, Fl
    Posts
    325
    Quote Originally Posted by Tbbt
    In another post he said he bought the low mileage 3.0L.
    Basic, will be a complainer soon.

  13. #12
    Knight75 is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): escalade
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Age
    41
    Posts
    51

    Re: fully loaded vs luxury?

    i put a deposit down on the 3.0 and have option to purchase the other one

  14. #13
    Knight75 is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): escalade
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Age
    41
    Posts
    51

    Re: fully loaded vs luxury?

    So after a week of discusses with my wife we decided to go with the 2010 3.0. It doesn't have the power like my 2007 escalade or the 3.6 but we very happy. looking forward to enjoying our new car.

  15. #14
    Tbbt is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 2010 CTS4 Premium Wagon-Diamond White-Cashmere Interior
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Castle Pines, CO
    Age
    73
    Posts
    2,391

    Re: fully loaded vs luxury?

    Enjoy!

  16. #15
    blankster is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 2010 CTS Premium AWD 3.6 DI (Sold)
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Chicago Area
    Posts
    472

    Re: fully loaded vs luxury?

    I think the 2009 3.6 still had cam chain problems - 2010 has the updated rocker pannels - You made the right choice.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum