K, imma have some fun with this. And try to prove my piont (see post number 23, page 2, of this thread).
V2 is advertised to have 556bhp. Can we all agree that these numbers are under optimal conditions????
Moving in....
V1 is advertised to have 400bhp. 156bhp less than a V2.
My V got 436rwhp. So I guess this puts me at 510bhp. 46bhp less than a V2, and 2-300lbs lighter.
But these were not-so-good conditions for a Maggie.
^^^hmmm^^^
Not gonna look through the posts, and I'm not calling anyone out,,,just sayin
Couple people posted some "good" dyno numbers for the V2s. Another person seems to have focused on a "low" V2 dyno number vs a quite high (IMHO :want
V1 dyno number. Just watched the video of the V2 at 470rwhp. But did you notice the torque?
^^^also Hmmm^^^
I assumed my car can't take a stock V2,,,,but it would be nice to find out I'm wrong
We can play with the numbers all day. But it don't mean doodoo till it's done on the road. Forget 0-60,,,not happening. It would have to be a rolling start. Then we'll see who's car is faster,,,,,,,,at which point, we can start arguing about the mods :alchi::alchi:
Tony