XM SQ vs. FM
Cadillac
 

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds / (Old System)

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors

CadillacForums.com is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
2004-2007 Cadillac CTS-V General Discussion Discussion, XM SQ vs. FM in Cadillac CTS-V Series Forum - 2004 - 2007; I work for a company that has a lot of newer cars with satellite radio in them. I'm pretty impressed ...
  1. #1
    GDPossehl is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): '04 CTS-V
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Decatur, GA
    Posts
    502

    XM SQ vs. FM

    I work for a company that has a lot of newer cars with satellite radio in them. I'm pretty impressed with the SQ of the new radios. However, when I get in mine I'm thoroughly disappointed. Even FM radio sounds better than the XM SQ in my V. I've got an upgraded & amped subwoofer in the rear deck that sounds great with CD's and pretty good with FM radio. Have the XM receivers changed in recent years or is it just another downfall we face?

    My XM service expired last month and if I can't improve the quality of the sound it's not worth paying for IMO.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    CadillacForums.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Bigron is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): 2010 CTS-V
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Southfield, MI
    Posts
    934

    Re: XM SQ vs. FM

    Yes the sound quality is worse and yes they have improved since then. Remember the receiver is the same one that was used in the 2003 CTS when it launched. Probably close to a 10 year old design at this point.

  4. #3
    CadzillaTN's Avatar
    CadzillaTN is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 2004 CTS-V
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,069
    At best, satellite sounds like a low bit rate mp3 file. One gets used to it after a while, but once you hear fm radio or cd you can tell how bad it is.

    I'd like to know why some stations sound like crap compared to others, even with the same eq settings...seems like maybe they allocate more bandwidth to some stations than others? I've also noticed the big "fm" stations being pumped through xm sound better than the regular music stations...so maybe original format factors into the equation..

  5. #4
    GDPossehl is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): '04 CTS-V
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Decatur, GA
    Posts
    502
    Thread Starter

    Re: XM SQ vs. FM

    I wonder if swapping in a new XM receiver from a newer model car would be possible. Do the 07's have the same receiver as the 04?

  6. #5
    Aurora40's Avatar
    Aurora40 is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): '06 CTS-V
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    The Old Dominion
    Age
    39
    Posts
    729

    Re: XM SQ vs. FM

    I thought the rumor back in the day was that Sirius had better sound quality. Perhaps the new XM stuff uses the Sirius band, thus the percieved improvement.

    I thought both were fairly tight-lipped about the actual bit rate they send.

  7. #6
    GDPossehl is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): '04 CTS-V
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Decatur, GA
    Posts
    502
    Thread Starter

    Re: XM SQ vs. FM

    I wonder who I'd even be able to contact at SiriusXM about that stuff. I'd like to figure that out. Considering it's entirely dependent on me paying for the service I think they might be willing to take a stab at it to help a bro out.

  8. #7
    repenttokyo is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 2004 CTS-V
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,170

    Re: XM SQ vs. FM

    Quote Originally Posted by CadzillaTN View Post
    At best, satellite sounds like a low bit rate mp3 file. One gets used to it after a while, but once you hear fm radio or cd you can tell how bad it is.

    I'd like to know why some stations sound like crap compared to others, even with the same eq settings...seems like maybe they allocate more bandwidth to some stations than others? I've also noticed the big "fm" stations being pumped through xm sound better than the regular music stations...so maybe original format factors into the equation..
    yes, that's exactly how it works. the talk channels especially are given very low bandwidth.

    lots of answers to these questions at www.xmfan.com.

  9. #8
    GDPossehl is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): '04 CTS-V
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Decatur, GA
    Posts
    502
    Thread Starter

    Re: XM SQ vs. FM

    Thanks for the link. I'll do some reading.

  10. #9
    GDPossehl is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): '04 CTS-V
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Decatur, GA
    Posts
    502
    Thread Starter

    Re: XM SQ vs. FM

    Made a thread over there and got some responses from the guy that seems to know his stuff best.

    Quote Originally Posted by GDPossehl View Post
    Yes, I've adjusted it in the limited ways I could. Low Mid High adjustments. I've upgraded the sub and used an amp with high level inputs to conquer the lack of bass. Sounds great with a CD, mediocre and tolerable with FM, but xm was still lacking.

    I think my biggest question is why do the newer cars sound so much better? What's going on that's different from mine and how can I upgrade? I have no problem scouting out new hardware.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
    I think you've pretty much summed up the music-listening experience.

    As far as your comparisons of your car vs. a newer car, I think that's because the differences in the factory sound systems. An XM tuner made in 04 has no sound quality difference as a new tuner put in a 2011. It's the processing and overall performance of the factory system after the audio leaves the tuner than makes the difference.
    So I think we're just screwed all around with these POS units.

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Bookmarks

Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum
Need products for your Cadillac? Check out your options at the links below:

custom floor mats | Cadillac Chrome and Black Chrome Wheels | window tinting