Here are afew key posts that should shed some light on what's actually been said here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tony Show  Buick Lucerne = Cadillac DTS. Big, pillowy luxury cars always have more room inside than sport sedans. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katshot If you look at the specs, it's VERY hard to make that statement. The STS is closer to the LaCrosse than the Lucerne in some dimensions, and the DTS is "generally" larger than all of them. There's also a HUGE price difference between the Lucerne and the STS. I'm not insinuating that these two ARE direct competitors, they just happened to be close to each other on the floor, and therefore "seemed" a close comparo. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tony Show STS / Lucerne
Rear Leg Room 38.3 / 41.4 (+3.1)
Shoulder Room 57.4 / 57.0 (+2.6)
3 inches more both leg room and shoulder room in the Lucerne- it's a bigger car. |
(notice in the above quote the items in bold italics don't support the following sentence) Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tony Show STS Dimensions Lucerne Dimensions The Lucerne is bigger in every measurable category. I don't see why it's so hard to grasp why a car built on the DTS platform has more room than a car built on the CTS platform. |
(Please take note of the sentence in bold italics above)
With any luck, this may clear up my stance here but in the case that anyone here still feels that I haven't been consistent in this thread, please point out how.