03-25-08, 11:55 AM
|
| Cadillac(s): Mine: 04 Blk Raven CTS-V... Hers: 07 Blue Chip SRX | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Eyebrow MAN to you, sister
Posts: 9,831
Casino Cash: $4298
| |
| Re: Cadillac vs. BMW at The New York Car Show
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katshot  Also, in all four cars, I found that it was very hard getting my feet in and out of the rear seats due to lack of clearance and high sills.
Strangely, I noticed that I had none of these problems in the Buick Lucerne that was in the adjacent display area. I found it surprising that a Buick Lucerne had far more usable space in the passenger compartment than any of the Cadillacs and BMWs I looked at. | Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tony Show STS / Lucerne
Rear Leg Room 38.3 / 41.4 (+3.1)
Shoulder Room 57.4 / 57.0 (+2.6)
3 inches more both leg room and shoulder room in the Lucerne- it's a bigger car. The Lacrosse, on the other hand:
STS / Lacrosse
Rear Leg Room 38.3 / 37.6 (-0.7)
Rear Shoulder room 57.4 / 57.0 (-.04)
The Lacrosse would be a much better size comparison. | Really? Huh.... |