Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadillac Tony  Oooh....is that one of the $90,000 dollar M5s that's slower than a 2009 CTS-V and has no satellite radio and lumbar, or is that the $95,000 one that has the standard Cadillac features and is still slower than a CTS-V? It's hard to tell from the pictures. |
Well, in the BMW's defense, I can't believe I am typing this, after 3 years of use which will have depriciated less?
I bring this up because it is just about my number 1 concern when it comes to purchasing a 70k cadillac new. I have watched the V1 CTS-V, STS-V, and XLR-V take some pretty big tumbles.. Hell my almost 60k 02 completley loaded DTS is worth about 15k now.
I am completley confident that dollar for dollar you will get helluva more car in the 09 V than in the M5.. no question, no doubt. And as you obviously know I am planning on a purchase of one. Yet the history of Cadillacs depriciation cannot be ignored.