View Single Post
  #207 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-08, 09:47 PM
N0DIH's Avatar
N0DIH N0DIH is offline
Cadillac Owners Master
Cadillac(s): 94 Fleetwood Brougham
View N0DIH's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
Age: 42
Casino Cash: $9087
iTrader: (0)
Re: The "4.9 liter turbocharger, stage 1" thread.

He might be, but there is likely something he isn't telling you too. Either extra fuel adder somewhere or he isn't making the power he claims. Honestly, 300 hp on the rear wheels? That is a low 13 sec car. Or better. I would expect better than that. If not, he isn't making the power he claims. Have him stick a WB O2 on and make a quarter mile run and show you. Either he is running lean as heck, he isn't making near the power he claims (how much boost?), or he is running something extra like methanol injection to keep things sane.

My 301 Turbo pushed my 4030 lb Trans AM to 14.21@97.3 mph and that was a calculated 290 rwhp. Now put that in a lighter car, with more cam, a better turbo design (mine was awful), much better gearing, etc. That car should be darn close to 12's.

And you have to REALLY watch boost on stock hypereutectic pistons. They will crack. And what happens then sucks.... I melted #7 down on my 301 Turbo. And that was a well factory modified Q-Jet, 800 CFM, super rich "DX" rods and I STILL leaned out and lunched a piston.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost C View Post
So I guess the guy with the turbo 4.9 Fiero who told me he was running stock injectors told me wrong? His motor, as of the last time I spoke with him, had made over 300 1/4 mile passes (and was making over 300whp and close to if not more than 400ft/lbs) and never had a problem with the motor.