|
Nazarboncuk03 (June 9, 2008 at 12:22 pm)
was ist das für ein scheisss
legionofwarriors (May 15, 2008 at 1:55 pm)
volvo looks so much worse
alexxtazy (April 30, 2008 at 7:49 pm)
volvo is one of the best cars in the world
mbokeroth (April 28, 2008 at 10:29 pm)
From Sweden: Fuck volvo
Gavichap (March 30, 2008 at 12:01 am)
As I said in another post, passive safety is in direct relation to chassis engineering. So, the newer, the better. In these older models cabin compartment is not designed to withstand the extra forces of an offset impact, nor the front is conceived to absorb them before they deform the passenger cell. No airbags would have saved the driver, nor maybe the rear passenger behind him. Sad, but true.
Cpeter123 (March 4, 2008 at 9:35 am)
well the BMW was smashed beyond repair
however the volvo simply drove away unscratched
RandaGeox (February 25, 2008 at 4:57 am)
dude? probably not they look like they're new
smartestinUSA (February 23, 2008 at 6:57 pm)
were those cars damaged by the crash?
CrazyDave650 (February 23, 2008 at 6:45 am)
the old ones are struckturaly solid the new ones are also solid with more absorption, neither car my '91 volvo 940T with a air bag or a brand new s60 would deliver some one from that alive all the safety stuff is for slower speeds
DIESEL124 (January 31, 2008 at 2:41 pm)
wrong u can survive on even 300 km/h if u roll but not head on |